Multi-source value
OEV, TED and NRW all contribute usable matches in a CPV-filtered run. TED is clearly visible in this example.
ProofGerman Tender MonitorCPV 72
CPV 72 quality check for German Tender Monitor.
This proof documents a real Apify run on build 0.1.18. The goal is to show that the Actor returns not just data, but deduplicated, usable and verifiable rows for IT-related public tenders from multiple sources.
Run evidence
Verified on real cloud data.
The CPV 72 run is the strongest demo case because it targets IT services and avoids the fuzziness of broad keyword monitoring.
RunkRFxRSEhBw8BIavg2
Build0.1.18 / UC9recgEjDZXrgMJG
DatasetSR9jTTXrEwTygzeVn
Input{"pubMonth":"2026-06","maxItems":500,"cpv":"72"}
Rows324 emitted from 353 matched rows
Source mix164 OEV, 143 TED, 17 NRW
Integrity0 missing core fields, 0 placeholder titles, 0 duplicate canonical fingerprints
CPV labels324/324 rows with CPV labels
Deadlines161 rows with available deadlines
RankingsourceBalance=null; filtered runs stay relevance-ranked
Interpretation
What this test proves and what it does not.
Dedupe quality
The checked output had no duplicate canonical fingerprints and no missing core fields.
No completeness guarantee
The test proves quality in the checked window, not complete coverage of every German procurement portal.